General Meeting Information

Date: January 30, 2018
Time: 4 - 5 p.m.
Location: ADM 109

  • Agenda

    Time Topic Purpose Discussion Leader
    4:00 - 4:05 p.m.

    Approval of Notes from January 23rd meeting

    		 A
    • Nguyen
    • Espinosa-Pieb
    4:05 - 4:15 p.m.

    Accreditation

    		 D
    • Espinosa-Pieb
    • Nguyen
    4:15 - 4:35 p.m.

    Review Criteria for Evaluating Programs

    		  I
    • Espinosa-Pieb
    • Nguyen
    4:35 - 4:45 p.m.

    Review Data from Mallory on Programs

    		 I Newell
    4:45 - 5 p.m.

    Work in Teams to Review Data and Programs

    		  D All

    A = Action
    D = Discussion
    I = Information

    Admin Reps Classified Reps Faculty Reps Student Reps
    • Christina Espinosa-Pieb, Co-Chair
    • Coleen Lee-Wheat
    • Anita Muthyala-Kandula
    • Lorrie Ranck
    • Thomas Ray
    • Margaret Bdzil
    • Precious Gerardo
    • Lorna Maynard
    • Anu Khanna
    • Amy Leonard
    • Rick Maynard
    • James Nguyen, Co-Chair
    • Mary Pape
    • Erik Woodbury

    Visitors:

  • Minutes

    Meeting Notes

    Espinosa-Pieb – Chair

    James Nguyen – Co-Chair

    Administrative Reps: Espinosa-Pieb, Fayek, Kandula, Lee-Wheat, Ranck, Ray

    Classified Reps: Bdzil, Gerardo, Lorna Maynard

    Faculty Reps: Khanna, Leonard, Rick Maynard, Nguyen, Pape, Woodbury

    Guests: Randy Bryant, Alicia Cortez, Mary Kay Englen, Dana Kennedy, Dawn Lee Tu, Lisa Markus, Mallory Newell

    Approval of Notes

    Change (i.e., installation) to (i.e., District fees)

    The notes from January 23, 2018 were approved with the above change.

    Accreditation 

    Espinosa-Pieb informed the team that Reaffirmation of Accreditation Letter was received on January 26, 2018 and can be found at http://www.deanza.edu/accreditation/

    Senior staff, in collaboration with Academic Senate, Deans, SLO Core-team and Online Education developed a plan addressing compliance requirements to meet Accreditation Standards.

    Pape notified the group that SLO Core-team would be adding an additional signature for the curriculum process to ensure that each Learning Outcome is assessed once every five years.  

    To ensure that every course syllabus includes Student Learning Outcome, the instructional deans will be requesting faculty to re-submit the course syllabus if they do not have SLO statement listed.

    Espinosa-Pieb noted that the Canvas software gives us the ability to verify online classroom interaction. Ranck is working on the report.

     Review Criteria for Evaluating Programs

    FTES, Enrollment, Productivity, Success Rates, Degrees and Certificates and Equity.

    • Look at programs which are under 500 in Productivity
    • Should we look at programs with FTES average under 100
    • Look at programs with lowest Fill and Success Rates
    • Add Equity Success Rate
     Review Data from Mallory on Programs

    Newell presented to the team various programs’ statistics based on the 5-years annual program reviews data.

    • The team has to decide how to use the given information
     Work in Teams to Review Data and Programs

    The committee will begin reviewing data for evaluating programs.

Documents and Links

Back to Top